Effectiveness and safety of direct oral anticoagulants among patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation and liver disease: A multinational cohort study.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The effects of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) and liver disease remain poorly understood. Our multinational cohort study assessed the effectiveness and safety of DOACs in this high-risk population. METHODS: We assembled two population-based cohorts in United Kingdom and in Québec of NVAF patients with liver disease initiating DOACs or vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) between 2011 and 2020. Using an as-treated exposure definition, we compared DOACs to VKAs and apixaban to rivaroxaban. After inverse probability of treatment weighting, Cox proportional hazards models estimated site-specific hazard ratios (HRs) and 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) of ischemic stroke and major bleeding. Site-specific estimates were pooled using random-effects models. Analyses were repeated among NVAF patients with cirrhosis. RESULTS: There were 11,881 NVAF patients with liver disease (2683 with cirrhosis). Among those, 8815 initiated DOACs (4414 apixaban, 2497 rivaroxaban) and 3696 VKAs. The HRs (95 % CIs) for DOACs compared to VKAs were 1.01 (0.76-1.34) for ischemic stroke and 0.87 (0.77-0.99) for major bleeding. Results were consistent among patients with cirrhosis. The HRs (95 % CIs) for apixaban compared to rivaroxaban were 0.85 (0.60-1.20) for ischemic stroke and 0.80 (0.68-0.95) for major bleeding. This decreased bleeding risk was not observed among patients with cirrhosis (HR, 1.01; 95 % CI 0.72-1.43). CONCLUSIONS: Among NVAF patients with liver disease, DOACs were as effective and slightly safer than VKAs, and apixaban was as effective but safer than rivaroxaban. The safety benefit with apixaban was not present among patients with cirrhosis.

Diagnostic Validity of Chronic Kidney Disease in Health Claims Data Over Time: Results from a Cohort of Community-Dwelling Older Adults in Germany.

Purpose: The validity of ICD-10 diagnostic codes for chronic kidney disease (CKD) in health claims data has not been sufficiently studied in the general population and over time. Patients and Methods: We used data from the Berlin Initiative Study (BIS), a prospective longitudinal cohort of community-dwelling individuals aged ≥70 years in Berlin, Germany. With estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) as reference, we assessed the diagnostic validity (sensitivity, specificity, positive [PPV], and negative predictive values [NPV]) of different claims-based ICD-10 codes for CKD stages G3-5 (eGFR <60mL/min/1.73m²: ICD-10 N18.x-N19), G3 (eGFR 30-<60mL/min/1.73m²: N18.3), and G4-5 (eGFR <30mL/min/1.73m²: N18.4-5). We analysed trends over five study visits (2009-2019). Results: We included data of 2068 participants at baseline (2009-2011) and 870 at follow-up 4 (2018-2019), of whom 784 (38.9%) and 440 (50.6%) had CKD G3-5, respectively. At baseline, sensitivity for CKD in claims data ranged from 0.25 (95%-confidence interval [CI] 0.22-0.28) to 0.51 (95%-CI 0.48-0.55) for G3-5, depending on the included ICD-10 codes, 0.20 (95%-CI 0.18-0.24) for G3, and 0.36 (95%-CI 0.25-0.49) for G4-5. Over the course of 10 years, sensitivity increased by 0.17 to 0.29 in all groups. Specificity, PPVs, and NPVs remained mostly stable over time and ranged from 0.82-0.99, 0.47-0.89, and 0.66-0.98 across all study visits, respectively. Conclusion: German claims data showed overall agreeable performance in identifying older adults with CKD, while differentiation between stages was limited. Our results suggest increasing sensitivity over time possibly attributable to improved CKD diagnosis and awareness.

Incretin-based drugs and the risk of diabetic retinopathy among individuals with type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.

AIM: The results from the SUSTAIN-6 trial generated some uncertainty regarding the association between incretin-based drugs [dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs)] and the risk of diabetic retinopathy. Our objective was to synthesize the available evidence from observational studies regarding the use of incretin-based drugs and the risk of diabetic retinopathy among individuals with type 2 diabetes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We systemically searched Cochrane Library, Embase and Medline to identify observational studies of interest. Risk of bias was assessed using the ROBINS-I tool. Data from included studies were pooled using the DerSimonian and Laird random-effect model with the Hartung-Knapp extension. RESULTS: We included 14 studies in the systematic review, with 10 examining DPP-4 inhibitors and seven examining GLP-1 RAs. Nine studies investigated incident diabetic retinopathy, six investigated diabetic retinopathy progression and two investigated both outcomes. Seven studies were at moderate risk of bias, four at serious risk of bias and three at critical risk of bias. Data pooled across studies showed no association between the use of DPP-4 inhibitors (risk ratio: 0.98, 95% confidence interval: 0.83, 1.17) or GLP-1 RAs (risk ratio: 0.87, 95% confidence interval: 0.56, 1.34) and the risk of diabetic retinopathy. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that the use of incretin-based drugs is not associated with the risk of diabetic retinopathy among individuals with type 2 diabetes. However, these findings should be interpreted with caution considering the limited quality of some of the available evidence.

Kidney function estimators for drug dose adjustment of direct oral anticoagulants in older adults with atrial fibrillation.

Background: The Cockcroft-Gault equation (CrClC-G) is recommended for dose adjustment of direct oral anticoagulant drugs (DOACs) to kidney function. We aimed to assess whether defining DOAC dose appropriateness according to various kidney function estimators changed the associations between dose appropriateness and adverse events in older adults with atrial fibrillation (AF). Methods: Participants of the Berlin Initiative Study with AF and treated with DOACs were included. We investigated CrClC-G and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) using the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration and European Kidney Function Consortium equations based on creatinine and/or cystatin C. Marginal structural Cox models yielded confounder-adjusted hazard ratios for the risk of mortality, thromboembolism and bleeding associated with dose status. Results: A total of 224 patients were included in the analysis (median age 87 years). Using CrClC-G, 154 (69%) had an appropriate dose of DOACs, 52 (23%) were underdosed and 18 (8%) were overdosed. During a 39-month median follow-up period, 109 (14.9/100 person-years) participants died, 25 (3.6/100 person-years) experienced thromboembolism and 60 (9.8/100 person-years) experienced bleeding. Dose status was not associated with mortality and thromboembolism, independent of the equation. Underdose status was associated with a lower risk of bleeding with all the equations compared with the appropriate dose group. In participants with discrepancies in dose status using CrClC-G and eGFR equations, the occurrence of endpoints did not differ between participants having an appropriate dose using CrClC-G or eGFR. Conclusion: In older adults with AF, the association of DOAC dose status with adverse events did not differ when using CrClC-G or eGFR. Our results suggest that eGFR equations are not inferior to CrClC-G within this context.

Clinically apparent Helicobacter pylori infection and the risk of incident Alzheimer's disease: A population-based nested case-control study.

INTRODUCTION: Our population-based study assessed whether clinically apparent Helicobacter pylori infection (CAHPI) is associated with the risk of Alzheimer's disease (AD). METHODS: We assembled a population-based cohort of all dementia-free subjects in the United Kingdom's Clinical Practice Research Datalink (UK CPRD), aged ≥50 years (1988-2017). Using a nested case-control approach, we matched each newly developed case of AD with 40 controls. Conditional logistic regression estimated odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of AD associated with CAHPI compared with no CAHPI during ≥2 years before the index date. We also used salmonellosis as a negative control exposure. RESULTS: Among 4,262,092 dementia-free subjects, 40,455 developed AD after a mean 11 years of follow-up. CAHPI was associated with an increased risk of AD (OR, 1.11; 95% CI, 1.01-1.21) compared with no CAHPI. Salmonellosis was not associated with the risk of AD (OR, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.82-1.29). DISCUSSION: CAHPI was associated with a moderately increased risk of AD. HIGHLIGHTS: CAHPI was associated with an 11% increased risk of AD in subjects aged ≥50 years. The increase in the risk of AD reached a peak of 24% a decade after CAHPI onset. There was no major effect modification by age or sex. Sensitivity analyses addressing several potential biases led to consistent results.

Pharmacologic Heterogeneity and Risk of Severe Hypoglycemia with Concomitant Use of Sulfonylureas and DPP-4 Inhibitors: Population-Based Cohort Study.

Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP-4i) interact with sulfonylureas to increase their risk of hypoglycemia. Our population-based study assessed whether intraclass pharmacologic heterogeneity among sulfonylureas (long- vs. short-acting) and DPP-4i (peptidomimetic vs. non-peptidomimetic) modifies this interaction. We conducted a cohort study using the UK's Clinical Practice Research Datalink Aurum linked to hospitalization and vital statistics data. We assembled a cohort of patients initiating sulfonylureas (2007-2020). Using a time-varying exposure definition, we assessed the risk of severe hypoglycemia (hospitalization with or death due to hypoglycemia) associated with (i) concomitant use of long-acting sulfonylureas (glimepiride and glibenclamide) with DPP-4i compared with concomitant use of short-acting sulfonylureas (gliclazide and glipizide) with DPP-4i; and (ii) concomitant use of sulfonylureas with peptidomimetic DPP-4i (saxagliptin and vildagliptin) compared with concomitant use of sulfonylureas with non-peptidomimetic DPP-4i (sitagliptin, linagliptin, and alogliptin). Time-dependent Cox models estimated confounder-adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Our cohort included 196,138 sulfonylurea initiators. During a median follow-up of 6 years, 8,576 events of severe hypoglycemia occurred. Compared with concomitant use of short-acting sulfonylureas with DPP-4i, concomitant use of long-acting sulfonylureas with DPP-4i was not associated with the risk of severe hypoglycemia (adjusted HR: 0.87, 95% CI: 0.65-1.16). Compared with concomitant use of sulfonylureas with non-peptidomimetic DPP-4i, concomitant use of sulfonylureas with peptidomimetic DPP-4i was also not associated with the risk of severe hypoglycemia (HR: 0.96, 95% CI: 0.76-1.22). Intra-class pharmacologic heterogeneity did not modify the association between concomitant use of sulfonylureas (short- vs. long-acting) and DPP-4i (peptidomimetic vs. non-peptidomimetic) and the risk of severe hypoglycemia.

Considerations on the use of different comparators in pharmacovigilance: A methodological review.

Pharmacovigilance studies based on spontaneous reporting systems use disproportionality analysis methods to identify drug-event combinations with higher-than-expected reporting. Enhanced reporting is deemed as a proxy for a detected signal and is used to generate drug safety hypotheses, which can then be tested in pharmacoepidemiologic studies or randomized controlled trials. Higher-than-expected reporting means that the reporting rate of a drug-event combination of interest is disproportionately higher than the rate in a specific comparator or reference set. Currently, it is unclear which comparator is the most appropriate for use in pharmacovigilance. Moreover, it is also unclear how the selection of a comparator may affect the directionality of the various reporting and other biases. This paper reviews commonly used comparators chosen for signal detection studies (active comparator, class-exclusion comparator, and full data reference set). We give an overview of the advantages and disadvantages of each method based on examples from the literature. We also touch upon the challenges related to the derivation of general recommendations for the selection of comparators when mining spontaneous reports for pharmacovigilance.

Use of a Statistical Adaptive Treatment Strategy Approach for Emulating Randomized Controlled Trials Using Observational Data: The Example of Blood-Pressure Control Strategies for the Prevention of Cardiovascular Events Among Individuals With Hypertension at High Cardiovascular Risk.

Statistical approaches to adaptive treatment strategies (ATS) can be used to mimic the sequential decision-making inherently found in clinical practice. To illustrate the use of a statistical ATS approach, we emulated a target trial of different blood pressure (BP) control plans for the prevention of cardiovascular events among individuals with hypertension at high cardiovascular risk, inspired by the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT). We included 103,708 patients with hypertension and a "QRISK3" estimated 10-year risk of cardiovascular disease of ≥20% who initiated an antihypertensive drug between 1998 and 2018. Dynamic marginal structural models estimated the comparative effects of treating patients with intensive (target BP: 130/80 mm Hg), standard (140/90 mm Hg), and conservative (150/90 mm Hg) BP control strategies. The adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) for the intensive versus standard strategy were 0.96 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.92, 1.00) for major adverse cardiovascular events and 0.93 (95% CI: 0.88, 0.97) for death from cardiovascular causes. For the conservative versus standard strategy, they were 1.06 (95% CI: 1.02, 1.10) and 1.08 (95% CI: 1.03, 1.13), respectively. These results are largely compatible with SPRINT. ATS can be used to emulate randomized controlled trials of complex treatment strategies in an observational setting and represents an alternative approach for situations where randomized controlled trials are not feasible.

Concomitant use of statins and sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors and the risk of myotoxicity reporting: A disproportionality analysis.

AIMS: Recent case reports have suggested that sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors may interact with statins to increase their risk of myotoxicity. We assessed the risk of myotoxicity reporting associated with concomitant use of SGLT2 inhibitors and statins. METHODS: We queried the US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) from 2013 to 2021 for reports including SGLT2 inhibitors, statins or both. We estimated several measures of disproportionate reporting of myopathy and rhabdomyolysis associated with concomitant use of SGLT2 inhibitors and statins: reporting odds ratio (ROR) with 95% confidence interval (CI), Ω shrinkage measure (safety signal if >0) and an extension of the proportional reporting ratio (PRR) (two-criteria set, safety signal if both criteria are met), using the full FAERS dataset as the reference set. In sensitivity analyses, we focussed on specific SGLT2 inhibitor-statin pairs with higher interaction potential (canagliflozin-rosuvastatin, empagliflozin-rosuvastatin) and accounted for stimulated reporting. RESULTS: There were 456 myopathy and 77 rhabdomyolysis reports involving both an SGLT2 inhibitor and a statin. Concomitant use of SGLT2 inhibitors and statins was not associated with an increased risk of myopathy (ROR 0.79, 95% CI 0.70 to 0.89) or rhabdomyolysis (ROR 0.58, 95% CI 0.41 to 0.83) reporting. For both outcomes, the Ω shrinkage measure was negative and only one criterion of the PRR extension was met. SGLT2 inhibitor-statin pairs with higher interaction potential yielded potential signals for rhabdomyolysis; these signals disappeared after accounting for stimulated reporting. CONCLUSION: There was no increased risk of myotoxicity reporting associated with concomitant use of SGLT2 inhibitors and statins or for specific drug pairs.

Sulphonylureas versus metformin and the risk of ventricular arrhythmias among people with type 2 diabetes: A population-based cohort study.

AIM: To determine whether the use of sulphonylurea monotherapy, compared with metformin monotherapy, is associated with an increased risk of ventricular arrhythmia (VA) among patients initiating pharmacotherapy for type 2 diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We conducted a population-based cohort study using electronic health data extracted from the UK's Clinical Practice Research Datalink Aurum. Using the active comparator, new-user cohort design, we compared rates of VA among patients aged 18 years or older using sulphonylurea monotherapy with those using metformin monotherapy as their initial pharmacological treatment for type 2 diabetes from April 1998 to December 2019. We used a Cox proportional hazards model with inverse probability of treatment weighting by propensity score to estimate the adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) and a corresponding bootstrap 95% confidence interval (CI) for VA with sulphonylurea monotherapy versus metformin monotherapy. RESULTS: The cohort included 92 638 new users of sulphonylurea and 506 882 new users of metformin. A total of 279 VA events occurred among sulphonylurea users (rate per 10 000 person-years: 25.5, 95% CI: 22.7 to 28.7) and 1537 VA events occurred among metformin users (rate per 10 000 person-years: 18.5, 95% CI: 17.6 to 19.5). Compared with metformin, sulphonylureas were associated with an increased risk of VA (aHR: 1.42, 95% CI: 1.18 to 1.69). CONCLUSIONS: Sulphonylureas are associated with an increased risk of VA when used as first-line therapy for type 2 diabetes relative to metformin use. This increased risk should be considered when prescribing sulphonylureas as an initial treatment for type 2 diabetes.

Common Vaccines and the Risk of Incident Dementia: A Population-based Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Observational studies suggesting that immunizations strongly decrease the risk of dementia had several methodological limitations. We assessed whether common vaccines are associated with the risk of dementia. METHODS: We assembled a population-based cohort of dementia-free individuals aged ≥50 years in the United Kingdom's Clinical Practice Research Datalink between 1988 and 2018. Using a nested case-control approach, we matched each patient with dementia with 4 controls. Conditional logistic regression yielded confounder-adjusted odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of dementia associated with common vaccines >2 years before the index date compared with no exposure during the study period. Moreover, we applied a 10-year lag period and used active comparators (participation in breast or prostate cancer screening) to account for detection bias. RESULTS: Common vaccines were associated with an increased risk of dementia (OR, 1.38 [95% CI, 1.36-1.40]), compared with no exposure. Applying a 10-year lag period (OR, 1.20 [95% CI, 1.18-1.23]) and comparing versus prostate cancer screening (1.19 [ 1.11-1.27]) but not breast cancer screening (1.37 [1.30-1.45]) attenuated the risk increase. CONCLUSIONS: Common vaccines were not associated with a decreased risk of dementia. Unmeasured confounding and detection bias likely accounted for the observed increased risk.

Concomitant Use of Sulfonylureas and ß-Blockers and the Risk of Severe Hypoglycemia Among Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: A Population-Based Cohort Study.

OBJECTIVE: The hypoglycemic potential of ß-blockers among users of sulfonylureas, drugs that strongly increase the risk of this potentially fatal adverse effect, is not well understood. Our population-based cohort study assessed the potential association between concomitant use of sulfonylureas and ß-blockers versus use of sulfonylureas alone and the risk of severe hypoglycemia. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Using the U.K. Clinical Practice Research Datalink Aurum, we included patients initiating sulfonylureas between 1998 and 2020, excluding those with ß-blocker use in the past 6 months. Time-dependent Cox models estimated hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% CIs of severe hypoglycemia (hospitalization with or death resulting from hypoglycemia; ICD-10 codes E16.0, E16.1, and E16.2) associated with current concomitant use of sulfonylureas and ß-blockers compared with current sulfonylurea use alone, adjusted for baseline confounders. We also compared current concomitant use of sulfonylureas and non-cardioselective versus cardioselective ß-blockers. RESULTS: Our cohort included 252,869 initiators of sulfonylureas (mean age 61.3 years; 43% female). Median follow-up was 7.9 years. The crude incidence rate of severe hypoglycemia was 7.8 per 1,000 per year. Concomitant use of sulfonylureas and ß-blockers was associated with an increased risk of severe hypoglycemia compared with sulfonylurea use alone (HR 1.53; 95% CI 1.42-1.65). There was no difference in the risk between concomitant use of sulfonylureas and noncardioselective ß-blockers and concomitant use of sulfonylureas and cardioselective ß-blockers (HR 0.95; 95% CI 0.74-1.24). CONCLUSIONS: ß-blockers could further increase the risk of severe hypoglycemia when used concurrently with sulfonylureas. ß-blocker cardioselectivity did not seem to play a major role in this regard.

Effectiveness and Safety of Direct Oral Anticoagulants Among Octogenarians with Venous Thromboembolism: An International Multidatabase Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: The effects of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) among octogenarian patients with venous thromboembolism remains poorly understood. To address this knowledge gap, our study aimed to assess the effectiveness and safety of DOACs compared to vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) among octogenarians with venous thromboembolism. METHODS: We conducted an international cohort study using administrative health care databases from Québec, Canada, and Germany. We assembled 2 population-based cohorts of octogenarians with incident venous thromboembolism initiating treatment with DOACs or VKAs. The study period spanned from January 2012 to the most recent date of data availability (Québec: December 2016; Germany: December 2019). Using an as-treated exposure definition, we compared use of DOACs to use of VKAs, applying inverse probability of treatment weighting based on high-dimensional propensity scores to balance exposure groups. Cox proportional hazards models estimated site-specific hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of recurrent venous thromboembolism, major bleeding, and all-cause mortality. The results were meta-analyzed using random-effects models. RESULTS: Overall, our study included 6737 octogenarians with venous thromboembolism (Québec: n = 2556; Germany: n = 4181) who initiated use of DOACs (n = 3778) or VKAs (n = 2959). When compared to VKAs, DOACs were associated with similar risks of recurrent venous thromboembolism (weighted HR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.43-1.46; I2 = 0.00), major bleeding (weighted HR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.57-1.63; I2 = 0.59), and all-cause mortality (weighted HR, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.81-1.34; I2 = 0.00). CONCLUSIONS: Among octogenarians with venous thromboembolism, DOACs showed a comparable effectiveness and safety compared to VKAs. Our results support the use of DOACs in this high-risk group.

Adherence and Quality of Life in Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation With Direct Oral Anticoagulants Versus Vitamin K Antagonists: A Systematic Review

Abstract Background Direct anticoagulants (DOACs) and vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) differ in pharmacokinetic characteristics, intensity of required laboratory monitoring, and costs. These differences could affect patients' adherence to treatment and quality of life (QoL). Objective To assess whether patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF) using DOACs have better treatment adherence and QoL when compared to patients using VKAs. Methods We conducted a systematic review in Medline, Embase, LILACS, SciELO, CINAHL, and Cochrane Central, until June 9, 2021. We included studies that estimated and compared treatment adherence and QoL between DOACs and VKAs in adults with non-valvular AF. The methodological quality of the studies was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) tools. The protocol was registered in the PROSPERO (CRD 42020165238). Results Sixteen studies, including 122,458 patients with non-valvular AF, evaluated adherence, and eleven studies, including 5,687 patients, assessed QoL. A variety of methods was used to measure adherence. Eleven studies showed no difference in adherence between DOACs and VKAs, while three studies favored VKAs over DOACs and two studies favored DOACs over VKAs. QoL was measured by specific (n = 3) or generic questionnaires (n = 8); results favored DOACs over VKAs in four studies, while in the other seven studies the results showed no difference between the groups. Meta-analyses were not performed due to high methodological heterogeneity among studies. Conclusions Available evidence regarding treatment adherence and QoL with DOACs and VKAs is characterized by methodological heterogeneity and conflicting findings.

Challenges in evaluating treatments for COVID-19: The case of in-hospital anticoagulant use and the risk of adverse outcomes.

Anticoagulants are a potential treatment for the thrombotic complications resulting from COVID-19. We aimed to determine the association between anticoagulant use and adverse outcomes among hospitalized patients with COVID-19. We used data from the COVID-19 International Collaborative Research Project in South Korea from January to June 2020. We defined exposure using an intention-to-treat approach, with person-time classified as use or non-use of anticoagulants at cohort entry, and a time-varying approach. The primary outcome was all-cause, in-hospital mortality; the secondary outcome was a composite including respiratory outcomes, cardiovascular outcomes, venous thromboembolism, major bleeding, and intensive care unit admission. Cox proportional hazards models estimated adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) of the outcomes comparing use versus non-use of anticoagulants. Our cohort included 2,677 hospitalized COVID-19 patients, of whom 24 received anticoagulants at cohort entry. Users were older and had more comorbidities. The crude incidence rate (per 1,000 person-days) of mortality was 5.83 (95% CI: 2.80, 10.72) among anticoagulant users and 1.36 (95% CI: 1.14, 1.59) for non-users. Crude rates of the composite outcome were 3.20 (95% CI: 1.04, 7.47) and 1.80 (95% CI: 1.54, 2.08), respectively. Adjusted HRs for mortality (HR: 1.12, 95% CI: 0.48, 2.64) and the composite outcome (HR: 0.79, 95% CI: 0.28, 2.18) were inconclusive. Although our study was not able to draw conclusions on anticoagulant effectiveness for COVID-19 outcomes, these results can contribute to future knowledge syntheses of this important question. Our study demonstrated that the dynamic pandemic environment may have important implications for observational studies of COVID-19 treatment effectiveness.

Obesity as a modifier of the cardiovascular effectiveness of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors in type 2 diabetes.

AIMS: To assess the association between the use of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2i) and cardiovascular outcomes and death as a function of obesity among patients with type 2 diabetes. METHODS: This new-user, active-comparator cohort study used U.K.'s Clinical Practice Research Datalink linked to Hospital Episodes Statistics repository and Office for National Statistics. The cohort included 34,128 new-users of SGLT2i matched 1:1 to 34,128 new-users of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP-4i) on body mass index and propensity score. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), overall and in body mass index (BMI) categories (≤24.9 kg/m2, 25.0-29.9 kg/m2, 30.0-39.9 kg/m2, ≥40 kg/m2). Secondary outcomes included all-cause mortality and hospitalization for heart failure. RESULTS: SGLT2i were associated with a decreased risk of MACE (HR: 0.78, 95 %CI: 0.69-0.88) compared to DPP-4i. This decreased risk was most pronounced among obese and severely obese patients (HR: 0.77, 95 %CI: 0.66-0.91; HR: 0.67, 95% CI: 0.49-0.91, respectively) but not among overweight patients (HR: 0.94, 95 %CI: 0.73-1.22). Similar patterns were observed for cardiovascular mortality, all-cause mortality, and heart failure. CONCLUSION: Compared with DPP-4i, the cardioprotective effect associated with SGLT2i is stronger among patients with higher BMI.

Bleeding in women with venous thromboembolism during pregnancy: A systematic review of the literature.

Objectives: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) represents an important cause of maternal morbidity and mortality. Estimates of bleeding associated with therapeutic-dose anticoagulation are variable. We describe the frequency of bleeding in pregnant women receiving therapeutic anticoagulation for VTE by means of a systematic review of the literature. Data Sources: Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched. Databases were searched from inception to February 27, 2022. There was no language or geographic location restriction. Methods of Study Selection: The search yielded 2773 articles with 2212 unique citations. Studies were included if they described pregnant women treated for an acute VTE with therapeutic-dose anticoagulation and a defined bleeding outcome was reported. Tabulation Integration and Results: Five studies met inclusion criteria. Included studies were judged to have a serious to critical risk of bias using the Risk of Bias in Nonrandomized Studies of Intervention tool. The rate of bleeding, as defined by respective studies, ranged between 2.9% and 30.0%. Two studies included control groups, one of which found no significant difference in the risk of bleeding between groups, while the other found a significantly increased bleeding risk associated with therapeutic anticoagulation. Conclusion: Among pregnant women anticoagulated for VTE, the reported bleeding risk is variable. The ability to draw definite conclusions is limited by the scarcity and low quality of the studies, the small number of included patients, and the heterogeneity of bleeding definitions used. Large-scale studies with standardized bleeding definitions are required to provide acute bleeding estimates and optimize the care of these patients. Systematic Review Registration: PROSPERO, CRD42021276771.